Comments on: Decoder Identification – part deux http://bs-and-t.com/2008/01/decoder-identification-part-deux/ Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:15:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Wayne Woodland http://bs-and-t.com/2008/01/decoder-identification-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Wayne Woodland Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:35:59 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/2008/01/14/decoder-identification-part-deux/#comment-139 Sorry Scott; Wouldnt have a clue - cant think of any other way to check other than it being identified as an NCE when you read the manufactuers value. Good luck in solving the mistory.... Wayne Sorry Scott;

Wouldnt have a clue – cant think of any other way to check other than it being identified as an NCE when you read the manufactuers value. Good luck in solving the mistory….

Wayne

]]> By: Doug Whitman http://bs-and-t.com/2008/01/decoder-identification-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-138 Doug Whitman Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:13:56 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/2008/01/14/decoder-identification-part-deux/#comment-138 Scott It may have been a decoder for F unit or old GP7/9 which did not have a rear light. It is too small for a LE103, they were almost two inches long. Some of the older decoders may not have todays manufactor's code installed, so Decoder Pro may not see the correct hand shake. Doug Scott

It may have been a decoder for F unit or old GP7/9 which did not have a rear light.

It is too small for a LE103, they were almost two inches long.

Some of the older decoders may not have todays manufactor’s code installed, so Decoder Pro may not see the correct hand shake.

Doug

]]>