<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Land Between</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bs-and-t.com/2009/06/the-land-between/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bs-and-t.com/2009/06/the-land-between/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olav M</title>
		<link>http://bs-and-t.com/2009/06/the-land-between/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Olav M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bs-and-t.com/?p=738#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Hello
The obvious name for that area near Kenville would be Kenwood or Kenwood Flats. Or Chappelwood (?) 
Or you could turn it into a place with a name telling that there&#039;s very little left here...
By the way I realize we do too little modelling of such areas, this gives real distance between more interesting (?) spots to model. Great work!
Greetings from Olav in Norway

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Greetings to you, Olav in Norway, from Scott in P.E.I. Canada!  Thank you for your comment!

Great ideas for names!  I thought of a pretty good one one evening while driving and now, for the life of me I can&#039;t remember it.  I&#039;ll certainly keep those in mind.

I&#039;m not a big fan of having a caboose in one town while the locomotive is in another town.  I wanted to have more distance between towns (switching areas) but I also wanted to have lots of switching opportunities, so the compromise was made.  We make so many compromises as model railroaders, don&#039;t we?  I have a plan in mind for the rebuild that will happen in a few years that will put more distance between switching areas and keep roughly the same amount of switching.  It will be sort of a multi-level layout without a separation between the levels, just view blocks.

Thanks again for visiting the Bayside &amp; Tidewater!  Come back and comment again!

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
The obvious name for that area near Kenville would be Kenwood or Kenwood Flats. Or Chappelwood (?)<br />
Or you could turn it into a place with a name telling that there&#8217;s very little left here&#8230;<br />
By the way I realize we do too little modelling of such areas, this gives real distance between more interesting (?) spots to model. Great work!<br />
Greetings from Olav in Norway</p>
<p><strong><em>Greetings to you, Olav in Norway, from Scott in P.E.I. Canada!  Thank you for your comment!</p>
<p>Great ideas for names!  I thought of a pretty good one one evening while driving and now, for the life of me I can&#8217;t remember it.  I&#8217;ll certainly keep those in mind.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of having a caboose in one town while the locomotive is in another town.  I wanted to have more distance between towns (switching areas) but I also wanted to have lots of switching opportunities, so the compromise was made.  We make so many compromises as model railroaders, don&#8217;t we?  I have a plan in mind for the rebuild that will happen in a few years that will put more distance between switching areas and keep roughly the same amount of switching.  It will be sort of a multi-level layout without a separation between the levels, just view blocks.</p>
<p>Thanks again for visiting the Bayside &#038; Tidewater!  Come back and comment again!</p>
<p>Scott</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

