Comments for http://bs-and-t.com Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:51:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 Comment on UMG Module Connection Test by Scott http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/umg-module-connection-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1682 Scott Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:51:42 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1144#comment-1682 It went well. It actually made a more solid connection than clamps. Alignment of the hinges and insertion of the pins was quite simple. The part I was most concerned about was removing the pins but they came out quite easily. I should have taken pictures. Oops.

]]> Comment on UMG Module Connection Test by Doug http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/umg-module-connection-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1681 Doug Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:49:08 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1144#comment-1681 Ok Scott

How did the test go on the weekend ?

Doug

]]> Comment on Saint John Visitors by Scott http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/saint-john-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-1680 Scott Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:34:38 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1169#comment-1680 Yup. May 11 according to the plan. See you then!

]]> Comment on Saint John Visitors by Wayne Woodland http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/saint-john-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-1678 Wayne Woodland Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:09:14 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1169#comment-1678 Great to see action on the PEI layouts Scott. Heard you folks are going to get over here soon. See you then.

Wayne

]]> Comment on Saint John Visitors by Scott http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/saint-john-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-1664 Scott Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:16:29 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1169#comment-1664 Derwin and I are glad it was worth the drive! Hopefully we can do it again some day. I know we will be traveling to Saint John again!

]]> Comment on Saint John Visitors by Steve http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/saint-john-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-1663 Steve Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:19:21 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1169#comment-1663 We had a great time, Scott. Thanks for making it a very worthwhile trip.

]]> Comment on UMG Module Connection Test by sajay http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/umg-module-connection-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1651 sajay Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:45:54 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1144#comment-1651 Hmmm…. I’ll have to have a look for a locking snap latch.

]]> Comment on UMG Module Connection Test by Ewen http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/umg-module-connection-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1649 Ewen Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:46:09 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1144#comment-1649 True for an ordinary latch, but a locking snap latch you will give you vertical alignment because they are locked in place. The 90 degree corners would be tricky but there are solutions in the design of the actual module….. Good discussion

]]> Comment on UMG Module Connection Test by Scott http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/umg-module-connection-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1648 Scott Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:56:01 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1144#comment-1648 Yes, latches look like they would work very well too but they wouldn’t work in a 90 degree corner. You would also need something else to garauntee vertical alignment.

]]> Comment on UMG Module Connection Test by Ewen http://bs-and-t.com/2013/04/umg-module-connection-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1647 Ewen Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:35:28 +0000 http://bs-and-t.com/?p=1144#comment-1647 Hi Scott:

I agree whole heartedly with Chris. I have used them on past layouts too that would get moved and they did hold things together and aligned well every time.

I also used large latch snaps. They worked well too.

Cheers,
Ewen

]]>